Economic study

The economic study after the delay in the RD of Specialties

The General Director of Professional Planning, Vicenç Martínez.

The final approval of Royal Decree of Specialties, that the Ministry of Health had planned to undertake in the first months of 2022, is taking longer than expected and suspicion is growing in the environment of the National Specialties Commission as to the reason justifying this delay. And it is that, as they transferred to medical writing members of the said Commission, the portfolio led by Carolina Darias would work on the economic report preparation who would accompany the RD.

As this newspaper has already announced, the latest draft of the new regulations that regulate medical specialties had no economic relationship because Health has understood that it has no impact on the general state budget or on the accounts of the autonomous communities.

However, health professionals allude to the fact that the ministry has changed its mind, since, according to several sources from the various specialty commissions, they want prevent recurrence What happened with him failure of the royal decree of the basic content.

You have to remember that it was overturned by the Supreme Court because its regulatory analysis report in terms of economic and budgetary impact was “manifestly insufficient”. A conviction that came despite Health’s defense that its application would have no extraordinary cost for the autonomous communities. Something the Supreme didn’t fully understand.

A delay in R&D; in specialties supported by learned societies

Once the learned societies have already provided their arguments and given their approval to AR Spécialités’ latest project, they have understood and welcomed the delay in its final approval. Medical bodies consider it to be “Better to do things right and not be in such a rushfor the approval of the new regulations.

Moreover, they understand that the good thing is that any changes to do must go accompanied by a budget statement and a decision on how it will be implemented. “It’s part of the logic,” say sources close to the Commission. Likewise, if it is not true that they are working on it, they warn that falling back on the same stone “wouldn’t be smart” and they encourage the “only way” to make reforms is to make them “doable”.

What changes is the RD of specialties considering?

The long-awaited Specialty R&D; represents a major step in health training. With the aim of promoting continuing education and meeting European requirements, the bases for establishing a mandatory recertificationwhich will initially be every 10 years and as it develops the duration could be changed to 7 or 5 years.

Another key aspect is the progression in the subspecialization or subspecialization through the degrees of specific area of ​​training (ACE) and. A training modality where you can bring together professionals who come from different medical specialties and share a common theme. An example would be a CEA in palliative care which would accommodate, among others, internists and family doctors.

Finally, it also renews certain aspects of the MIR. So now there will be no 4 year sanction without being able to pass the entrance examination to the National Health System (SNS) for those who renounce their MIR position.

Although it may contain statements, data, or notes from healthcare institutions or professionals, the information in Medical Writing is edited and prepared by journalists. We recommend that the reader consult a healthcare practitioner with any health-related questions.

source link